what to si

(“What to C?”)

“C” is not an “a”, and it is not a “b” — this is to suggest that C is consequently flowing and not merely a choice. They don’t have to watch the second episode of a TV programme unless clearly convinced that the pilot was worth their time. If they cut to “Episode 3,” they may get confused by the narratives and the plot. “The C” is not something to choose without having proceeded through a and b. “Later” can’t be “better” in separation with “former”, future — “brighter” in isolation from the past. Could C be lesser then? — It is up to a trial! That’s the thing with change — it doesn’t happen without trying. Well, that’s not accurate — “a change” occurs whenever they want it or not, but the positive change – the one that is desired, change made by vote — that one requires work.

So the C is for “the change,” right, or is it for “the choice?” Now, how about “courage?” — To bravely stand to let the b pass. They took the route less travelled; they bettered grit to proceed with the consistency and commit to a communion. The third way may be specified as not the other two. Not choosing between red or blue, pill or party, and credibly averting to mix them down to undecided purple. Continuity doesn’t reduce a choice to the set of the former probabilities. If C was about getting closer to “the destination,” this would limit them to cook with only two ingredients for the rest of the journey.

Skip “b” all along? Yes, although it’s troublesome and may turn into a problem if C is claimed too early too soon. Psychic regression is not possible, yet the struggle is painful nonetheless. In that life, they can only move forward. At the same time, they can only be hither and then — in the current. To enjoy local food, to embrace contemporary dance, to have an inclination for modern art. Move from contemplation to cultivation.

As it comes to a certain time, observers invariably grasp what they want to perceive, finding not just beauty but a resentment, rationalized as confusion. Others come to a bitter conclusion that C is anything but real. For all intents and purposes, a little mystery is reserved. And ultimately, the link between subject and object reverses.

Then what was un-seen reveals the un-seers.

four kinds of relationship between knower and known

personal names in tribal societies

linked mentions for "what to si":

1. say my name
   How do we live by the names given to us? How do we choose a name, or should I ask how does the name choose us? I use a mononym — levèlsi — and choose to write it in lowercase letters. This stylistic decision is my way of resisting the authority over personal names.
   
2. Self-help Poetry
   “Self-help poetry” finds me in the most vulnerable period of my life. I craft a humorous verse and hurriedly send it to a woman in San Francisco,
   
3. courage to think things through for yourself
   That’s what Emerson meant when he said that “he who should inspire and lead his race must be defended from travelling with the souls of other men,
   
4. writings
   bender traincat heron pip boy Perspective on Psychological Work What are Us? What is Introspection? Why Coach Introspection? Who is a Good Coach?